Friday, March 30, 2012

From A Poem To A Song

Author's Note: This is a short response to two poems that are also songs.  I will be anaylizing the tone and mood and how they compare.

The poems, "Big Yellow Taxi" and "Field Below" are also songs. This is how I anaylized the songs are different from the books.  The tone and mood of both of these songs (poems); in my opinion, are sad, sorrowful, and a little depressing. To be honest, I didn't really like the first song at all, it was horrible, it didn't really make me understand it more.  The second one was way better, I liked it better because it fits with the mood and tone of the poem.  Like a peaceful wave, but a sad peaceful. Like when a relative dies, and during the funeral that feeling you get in your stomach that's like butterflies in your tummy. The first one was way different then the poem, just the mood, feeling, tone and all of that. The second one was more similar. And it was more easy to understand.

Friday, March 23, 2012

Oh No You Didn't!

DeeDee
How dare you
What are you thinking?
Taking my boy?
Oh girl, I don't think so!

Get your own
Don't steel mine
Why can't you find a man?
That's the same kind of fine

I just don't understand why
Oh don't sit next to mine
I could take you down with one finger
But then I'd have to linger

Paragraph;

This poem relates to the book, I'd Tell You I Love You But Then I'd Have To Kill You, this poem is about a character DeeDee and how Cammie feels about her just coming "into her relationship" So basically DeeDee is like a threat to Cammie.  The speaker is Cammie, and the audience would be DeeDee. The tone is angry, mad, and kind of defensive because she's kind of like, "girl, don't steel my man!"  The mood would be kind of sassy because Cammie is being like protective and she has a reputation like I can take you down easily, but then I'd have to leave.

Thursday, March 15, 2012

Reading Response

Author's Note: This is a short response to the poem, "Mother to Son" by Langston Hughes.  I am going to explain the mood/tone of the story and the figurative language used.

In the poem, "Mother to Son" by Langston Hughes, the author uses a handful of creative figurative language… He uses metaphors, hyperboles, and maybe symbolism, I'm not 100% sure… But the main figurative language is a metaphor, an astonishing example would be, "Life for me ain't been no crystal stair."  The metaphor, "life for me ain't been no crystal stair," means that this mother's life wasn't as fancy as a crystal staircase. Maybe she was poor, maybe she had some family problems, or shelter issues.  The main idea of that metaphor is that she was down that bumpy, not fancy road and she was beaten down, she's had to climb down and up so many issues and events.  And she does not want her son to go down that same road, she wants him to never give up, be strong and independent. That's the main idea of the metaphor.  In my opinion, the tone of this story would be encouraging, yet serious because, again, she's been down that road she's flat out trying to say that to her son, and she wants to not have it sound like a joke, but she wants to be encouraging, that's how I think the author set the tone.  I think the mood enhanced the overall meaning of the story.

Friday, March 9, 2012

Character Description

Author’s Note: These are a few paragraphs about a character in the book, I’d Tell You I Love You, But Then I’d Have To Kill You, by Ally Carter.  My goal is to use Imagery and Figurative Language to describe the character.

Dee Dee is a very, very pretty.  Her eyes are as blue as a clean ocean; her hair is as light and beautiful as a ballerina. She is a very tall, skinny girl with a mix of personalities. I’d say she reminds me of a model, with her figure, looks, and personalities.  I say she's a mix of personalities because she is nice, but a little sassy and an equal amount of sarcastic attitude. She likes a boy named Josh who likes the main character, Cammie. 

She comes in right when Cammie and Josh were on a little 'date'.  That's the first time she is shown in the book.  She and a group of boys storm in the restaurant really loud and obnoxiously.  Dee Dee was as rude as the big, bad wolf from, “The Three Little Pigs”… I say that because while Josh and Cammie were on a "date" Dee Dee just walked in and sat right next to josh and started talking to only him and blushing… you could just tell that she likes him.  You can conclude from this that Dee Dee is a flirt, she kind of thinks she's 'all that' and she wants attention from everybody, especially from the boys.

Tuesday, March 6, 2012

Dee Dee

Author's Note: This is a couple paragraphs about a character in the book, I'd Tell You I Love You, But Then I'd Have To Kill You.
Characters are a very important part of a book, each and every one... Dee Dee is a very, very pretty, blue eyed, tall, bleach blonde with a mix of personalities.  I say she's a mix of personalities because she is nice, but a little sassy and an equal amount of sarcastic attitude. She likes a boy named josh who likes the main character, Cammie. 
She comes in right when Cammie and Josh were on a little 'date'.  That's the first time she is shown in the book.  She and a group of boys storm in the restaurant really loud and obnoxiously.  Dee Dee is kind of rude because while josh and Cammie were on a "date" Dee Dee just walked in and sat right next to josh and started talking to only him and blushing… you could just tell that she likes him.  You can conclude from this that Dee Dee is a flirt, she kind of thinks she's 'all that' and she wants attention from everybody, especially from the boys.

Monday, March 5, 2012

How Does a Problem Get Resolved?

Author’s Note:  This is a problem/ solution essay on the book, Speak, by Laurie Anderson Halse. I’m going to explain what the problem was, and how it was resolved, also how it could’ve been resolved.

            According to Melinda, the main character in the book, Speak, High School is a frightening place.  Melinda started freshman year, shy and with only one friend who she describes as ‘too happy’ and kind of ‘weird’.  Melinda’s teachers hated her, except for her art teacher, and her gym teacher just never paid much attention to her.

            Her kind of ex-bestfriend, Rachel had got them into the “End of the summer” high school- cheerleader party.  When they got there it was chaios! They did stuff that night that they can’t even believe… They were both drunk and dirty dancing!  When Melinda was dancing, a senior boy, came behind her and caught her before she fell to the ground.  She thought for a second that she would actually have a boyfriend, someone sweet and dreamy.  They were slow dancing, then suddenly, he kissed her!  She thought it was sweet, she thought it was a real moment! Then, he asked her a frankly embarrassing question… She had no clue what to say before she knew it, she was on the ground, shirt up, shorts down, and he had raped her… She didn’t know what to do, so she called the cops and it all when downhill from there.

            Throughout this book, she tells absolutely no one what had really happened, and every person in high school hates her for calling the cops.  Except for her science partner, who has a crush on her and the freshman who didn’t go to the party.  She didn’t try to solve her problem in the middle of the book because she was scared for her life.  Literally, she had a secret hiding spot in an abandoned janitor’s closet.

            Towards the end of the book, she starts becoming less shy and insecure.  By this time she has a decent amount of friends.  But when Rachel goes to senior prom with the boy who had raped her, Andy Evans, Rachel leaves him because he was being such a jerk.  The Monday after senior prom, Andy Evans does it again, this time instead of just laying there and not saying anything, she’s hitting him, screaming, and kicking, someone knocks on the door and she Melinda opens it up.  And suddenly she’s a hero, she exposed a beast and he gets in trouble and everything is good again.  This paragraph explains the solution that occurs in the book.

            The situation could’ve been resolved earlier in the story when at the start when someone asked her why she called the cops or gave her grief about it and she could’ve told them why, so then maybe they would understand a little bit.  That way, her freshman year wouldn’t have been so bad.  I believe this because everybody needs to speak out about their problems to someone so they will understand and maybe they can connect to that.

What's The Plot?


Author’s Note: This essay is to explain the plot of the book, The Westing Game, through what I would call, the “plot mountain”.  Which means; the introduction, rising action, climax, falling action, and the resolution/conclusion.  This is my text analysis essay.


The Westing Game is a mystery novel where throughout the story a friend/family member, Sam Westing is ‘dead’ and he left a note saying that there is a lot of money, but all the friends and family have to play a suspicious game to find it.
The Initial situation is that all of the carefully selected tenants move into Sunset Towers.  This would be the “rising action” to a plot.  This section does a great job of setting up both the time/place of the action and the many characters that will be living in it and taking part in the mystery. Sixteen characters are a lot to juggle, especially in a shorter novel, and Raskin does a great job of providing a little bit of detail on each of them while also advancing the plot.
The Main Conflict is that at the reading of Westing's will, the heirs/players find themselves signed up to play a strange game with a $200 million prize.  The idea of putting up a bunch of people to compete with one another to win a heck of a lot of money sets up a perfect, textbook conflict. There are eight teams of two and each of them wants to win the inheritance. It's husbands against wives, children against parents, and old enemies against high school students, as the group of sixteen works separately to figure out a prize that none of them are able to solve on their own.

There is some complication between the players. The players fight, grow close, mistrust each other, and learn as they investigate their clues – and one other.  There are sixteen people playing the game, and each of them encounters one complication. One sets off bombs, one hires a PI, three go to the hospital, and just about all of them spy on each other. During all this, we learn more about each of the characters, what their "real" identities are, and what some of them wish their real selves could actually turn out to be.

The climax would be the last part of the will reveals that no one got the right answer.  The heirs gather together to hear the last part of the will read; several teams are convinced they have the right answer, while other teams despair that they have no answer at all. What's interesting is that several teams' answers point to one character, Otis Amber, and none of them put him forward as the solution. Everyone's disappointed when the answer seems to be "Berthe Erica Crow," and Crow puts herself forward as the answer, while Sandy dies and the others find out that they seem to have lost the game.
In the chapter "Turtle's Trial," the characters go back over the will, interrogate witnesses, and at least one of them begins to put the puzzle together.  This section would be the “falling action”, that leads up to the conclusion.  In a trial-like scene, the remaining characters gather to go over the will, kind of like they did in the "Conflict" stage. This time, they go back over each of the details in the will, pausing to ask each other questions and try to find out what Westing meant. While everyone else seems to think the game is over, Turtle realizes it may not be, and races against the clock to figure out the answer without letting anyone else know she's onto something.
In this Novel, there are two endings, the first one is that the youngest player, Turtle solved the mystery but kept it a secret. This would be the start of the two conclusions. I would call this moment the first ending, even though it can also be seen as the ‘denouement’. This is because it's a way of figuring out the main problem at the heart of the story and putting the characters back in their places, but as such it also seems that the "solution" would be a kind of ending to the mystery. Anyway, Turtle figures out the puzzle, but nobody else does; the rest of the characters manage to content themselves with their shares in Sunset Towers and look toward the future.

Five years go by. Then, years after that, Sam Westing finally dies, and Turtle gets the prize for winning the game.
The two conclusion sections take two jumps forward in time: first, five years later, and second, about fifteen years after that. At each of these moments, the text reveals a rapid rundown of what's happened in or to each character's life, kind of like showing us a photo album at a high school reunion. We get closure on each of the characters, and watch as the prize that was won by Turtle during the denouement is finally and fully awarded.